Abstract

This study aimed at revealing the issue of the provisions and disposition of the partner in the common money through two angles. This behavior with regard to the contracting parties is correct, and with regard to the rest of the partners, it is dependent on their approval unless it is on their behalf, then it applies against them. As for the second angle, the partner's disposition is limited to an enhanced part of the common money, and if the ruling on this disposition appears before the division and its ruling after it, then the little division applies to him as he said in the first angle, which is to the disposer after division. This study is concluded with a conclusion that proves the most important findings and recommendations that it reached. One of the results is that the partner selling his share of the common money does not result in any problems as long as he disposes of his share, which he owns in all ownership. One of the recommendations is that the majority system stipulated by the legislator does not give sufficient guarantees for the minority, so we hope that the legislator will give more effective guarantees to the minority that will make their right to common money fully guaranteed.