Abstract

The study aimed to identify the degree of truthfulness of the results of the questionnaire distributed to students during the educational process such as questionnaires, evaluation of the course, assessment of the teacher of the course, assessment of academic programs, student activities, and other research surveys of the master's and doctorate and statistical studies distributed by researchers to student communities. In order to answer the questions of the study, (300) students from different colleges affiliated with different universities in the Makkah region was selected, A questionnaire was designed to some students of Saudi universities and then statistical treatments used through the statistical program SPSS, the most important results of the statistical analysis were: The agreement of the study sample members on the main reasons for the lack of interest in the questionnaire and its suitability for them and the low degree of validity of its results. There were no statistically significant differences at significant level (0.05) in the validity of the questionnaire results among to some students of Saudi universities in terms of gender. Also there were no statistically significant differences at significant level (0.05) in the validity of the questionnaire results among the student societies in terms of age. There were no statistically significant differences at significant level (0.05) in the validity of the questionnaire results among to some students of Saudi universities in terms of the academic section. There were no statistically significant differences at significant level (0.05) in the validity of the questionnaire results among to some students of Saudi universities in terms of the academic level. The researcher came out with a number of recommendations including: the need for universities to take actual steps in raising the validity of the questionnaire results to some students of Saudi universities through awareness of the role of the questionnaire and importance in the process of quality and development, and activating the electronic handling of the questionnaire through the university site throughout the year about the halls and schedules and tests and not limited on evaluate the lecturer by the end of the year only.